Here is a position from Tarrasch theory that has been fascinating me for a bit:
Here White takes on h7 with check as after 16.Bxh7+ Kxh7 17.Nxe6 Black can’t exchange queens due to the intermezzo of taking on f8 with check by White.
What fascinates me about this line is that White does something we’re generally taught not to do in an opening. We learn early on that exchanging two minors for a rook and pawn in an opening is bad. Of course here White gets a second pawn as well. Fascinating ideas here.
Here are a couple of games in this line…
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
As mentioned in my last post, I have begun to create pgn files when analyzing my games.
I have started with an opening that has plagued me on the White side for time out of mind…the French.
I’ve decided to base my lines on the Tarrasch, specifically the setup with 7.Ne2.
My methodology at this time is to pull all of the games between players rated a minimum of 2400 for the last five years and play through all of them to get a feel for which lines I like, then I’ll build more in depth files from there.
But for now I have around 50 games to go look at. Feel free to look at them with me as I have attached them in a file called “Francophile.”
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
On day two of the Tata Steel Masters group in Wijk an Zee. Vladislav Artemiev showed that not only does he belong in the top group, but that he can contend as well.
On the White side of the English the young Russian ground down his more experience countryman Nikita Vitiugov.
Here is a position that shows some things I’m really trying to refine in my own games:
How often would a club player either trade or not trade queens almost automatically as a matter of personal preference? Well here Artemiev trades queens, but for a specific reason.
After 16.Qxd8+ Rxd8 17.Be3 0-0 18.Bb6 it becomes clear that White will now control the d file as Black has difficulty challenging that control since White controls the d8 square.
At the same time, should Black recapture the queen with a move such as 16…Bxd8 then after 17.Bf4 White has a much better position:
Here is the entire game:
All in all a good performance by Artemiev and proof that he’s a got a bright future.
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
I’m trying to use blitz as more of a tool than I had been up until recently.
In the nine years since my return to chess I have played *maybe* 1,ooo games combined across all the servers.
This year I need to get somewhere around 1,000-1,500 games in. I should be averaging 3-5 per day, and giving them at least a brief analysis.
I hear all the reasons that people say blitz is a useful tool, and they are correct. Practicing openings and quick tactics are useful skills to hone in blitz.
I also find that playing more blitz helps me think more strategically as positional errors seem much easier to exploit in blitz since it’s harder (at least for me) to find accurate defensive moves quickly during a blitz game.
Let’s take this position from a game I just finished:
Here I should be on high alert because my queen is undefended. But I’m not.
My opponent plays 12…Nbd7 and after four seconds I play 13.Ne5??
I realize instantly what I’ve done, and wait for the inevitable 13…Nxe5 which wins on the spot.
Luckily my opponent misses it. We trade some strategic errors back and forth, along with some missed tactics such as this:
I miss the crushing 21.Bd6 here.
I also miss an easy mate in two here:
24.Qxf7+ Kg8 25.Qxg7# So easy, a caveman could do it. There is no excuse for missing these kinds of things.
Here’s one I miss one move later:
Let’s be honest, if I’m going to get to 1900 this year I can’t miss stuff like this. I’m thinking that my opponent did good here with 24…Ra7 because it prevents 25.Rxg7+ so I chop the rook with 25.Rxa7. However, 25.Bxg7 again would have won on the spot.
Here if my opponent plays 25…Rxf7 I simply mate on h8.
We get to this position where almost anything is winning for me…almost.
29.Bd6?? not only doesn’t win, but loses on the spot to 29…Qxd4!
Here is the entire game:
My opponent and I play again, and this time I win with a nice smothered mate:
In this game I made fewer errors, but they were still there.
I know that a lot of people have a tendency to say “Well, it’s only blitz.” or “You have to expect these kinds of errors in blitz.”
I think that is probably more wrong thinking. I think that if I play more blitz that I’ll start to see things much faster which should help some of my board vision issues.
I’m not sure if I can put a rating on it, but I think that perhaps another goal of mine should be to get to around 2000 in online blitz as that would be more of an indicator that my strategic instincts are being honed and that tactical patters are also much more ingrained.
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
Something I need to work on is putting an end to wrong thinking during games. Here’s an excellent example of that.
This is the position from my game Thursday. My opponent is a kid playing his first rated game. His strength is perhaps 500-600, so clearly the game is a mismatch.
My opponent castles
This hangs the e pawn, so I immediately give up the bishop pair
Except…I played 7.Bg5 here. Why? Here is the answer from my notes to the game:
“This is just wrong thinking. After chopping the knight to win the pawn I chose not to follow up properly because I feel that perhaps the extra tempi aren’t worth giving up. But there’s no place for feelings here. Just calculation. Which of course tells us that winning the pawn is the correct way to go since the extra tempi count for nothing in a position where Black can’t get to White and White controls the entire enter.”
So if I’m truly going to get to 1900 this year I’m going to have to stop this behavior. The thing is, I’d have snapped the pawn off in an instant against a stronger player.
Something to keep in mind.
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
Today is the first day of the new year. As I mentioned in a recent post my goal is to surpass my all time peak rating in 2020.
As of now that number stands at 1896.
So what’s the plan for today? Today I’m going to work on some Chessable opening course lines that I’ve been learning and I’m going to work on solving a couple of endgame studies from Domination in 2,545 Endgame Studies by Kasparian.
This is going to be my year. I’ll will it into being.
Til Next Time,
Chris Wainscott
If you like this blog, please consider becoming a Patreon supporter. Any money I raise will go towards lessons and stronger tournaments.
If you can spare it, please click here and become a supporter. Even $1 a month can help me achieve my dream.
