Today was day two of the re-launch of the 100 days of tactics.
Here are the cumulative results:
Interestingly I felt the same kind of surge I feel in an actual game when I’m in time trouble as I neared the end of my 30 min session.
This led me to miss the last two problems in some sort of “ratings chase” as I was practically gambling by rushing my moves to try to get back to my all time high on chesstempo. Because of course it tells you when you set a record.
Clearly I’ll need to work on emotional control while solving.
I am fortunate in that I’m not a jittery player. I don’t shake or fidget when sitting at the board and I rarely get nervous until I’m deep in time trouble.
Now I just need to work on that same calm while solving.
I’ve always taken exception to the fact that so many tactics trainers are timed.
Yes yes, in a game it’s you vs. the position *and* the clock.
When training, however, I think that it’s much more important to work on absorbing the patterns. The downside to the clock is that it practically eggs you on to make rash decisions which you haven’t properly calculated, thereby missing out on the opportunity to learn new stuff.
So how does a pro approach solving?
Let’s take a look at IM Andrey Ostrovskiy, who has many wonderful videos as well as an excellent Twitch channel.
As you can see, IM Ostrovskiy is not rushing to solve these positions. He’s taking his time and properly calculating everything prior to selecting a move. It’s also interesting to note how he flits between candidate moves the way that all of us do, rather than clean calculations to the end ala Think Like a Grandmaster.
A few weeks back I set a goal of solving tactics on chesstempo for an hour a day for 100 straight days.
A couple of issues immediately befell me. The first is that my job suddenly got more demanding. In fact, it looks like I’ll be travelling for work quite a bit over the next few months.
The downside to that is that those days are rarely short. And to be brutally honest the last thing I want to do when I get done with a 12 hour day in a strange city is rush back to the hotel and solve tactics.
If you happened to see my interview on chess^summit then you know that I was asked about this project and that I said I would be revising it and rolling it back out.
So the new plan is this…ideally I will get 30 minutes a day of tactics. However, I’m not going to focus too much on the length. If I feel like going longer I will. If I don’t have time to go that far, then I won’t. But the goal will be 30 minutes a day with at least *some* puzzles each day.
There may be unforeseen travel days, etc. where I am not able to do any, but I will try a more realistic goal this time.
The other issue I was having is that when I was spending an hour a day it was cutting far too deeply into my study time for other stuff.
Yesterday I played a game at the Southwest Club that I’m proud of. As you will see, it’s far from perfect, but I’m happy with the fact that I didn’t “play it safe” when it comes to material like I usually do.
I plan on making this the start of a new trend in 2018. It’s time to get back to my attacking roots and to be much more aggressive as long as I’m not being reckless.
One thing that I noticed yesterday that really came in to laser focus today is that I have a tendency to overly complicate things a lot of the time. There are many puzzles that I solved incorrectly because I would take an approach that would solve it while missing that there was a way to do it in fewer moves.
I’ve also started to notice that I have a tendency to miss tactics that involve pieces that hang in the middle of the lines. I also only notice loose pieces maybe half the time.
So those are things to work on.
After my session today my rating is 1579.7, representing a drop of 3.9 points. Insignificant whether that was a gain or a loss.
I also decided to start tracking how many problems I am solving correctly vs. missing. Today I solved 40 and missed 25. So again, this shows the percentage I will need to solve correctly in order to increase my rating.
I did email the admin of chesstempo regarding this challenge and something interesting I got back was this:
“Regarding your blog post, it is probably worth pointing out that to gain rating points you don’t really need to get that many more problems correct than incorrect to gain rating. The default difficulty setting (“normal”) gives you problems that are on average 100 points below your current rating. At that level of difficulty you get around a 66% success rate (again on average over a large number of problems, and assuming stable skill level). If you get higher than a 66% success rate, you’ll be gaining rating (again , on average over a large number of problems, short term fluctuations can lead to short term bursts of rating loss or gain). You can also change your difficulty level to change the success rate required to maintain a level rating. ‘Hard’ mode produces a 50% success rate over time if your skill level is stable as it gives you problems at your current level (on average). ‘Easy’ gives you problems 200 points below your rating, and you’ll get a roughly 80% success rate.” – Richard.
That is all interesting to know, although I think that I am going to just leave the settings as is and see what happens.